The Supreme Court Begins Hearing on GM Crops Controversy: FSII Optimistic about Favorable Outcome
As the Supreme Court of India begins hearing petitions related to the introduction of a stringent and transparent bio-safety test protocol for genetically modified (GM) crops, the Federation of Seed Industry of India (FSII) expresses optimism about a positive outcome. The FSII believes that a holistic picture needs to emerge, recognizing the significant role of technology in increasing agricultural production, the scientific evidence supporting GM crops, India’s robust regulatory systems, and the long-term interests of the nation.
The Controversy Surrounding GM Crops in India:
The acceptance and cultivation of genetically modified crops in India have always been a topic of debate and controversy. While some see GM crops as a solution to agricultural challenges, others express concerns about the long-term impacts on health, the environment, and traditional farming practices.
The Regulatory Framework for GM Crops in India:
India has a regulatory framework in place for the approval and cultivation of GM crops. The Genetic Engineering Appraisal Committee (GEAC) is responsible for evaluating and approving such crops. However, the GEAC has faced criticism from the Supreme Court for not considering the reports of the court-appointed Technical Experts
The Cultivation of Geneticall Modified Crops in India:
Currently, GM crop cultivation in India is mainly focused on cotton, with limited cultivation of Bt brinjal. Bt cotton, genetically modified to express a toxin from the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis, was the first GM crop approved for commercial cultivation in India. It gained widespread adoption among cotton farmers due to its effectiveness against certain pests. Bt brinjal, genetically modified to resist certain pests, was approved for commercial cultivation in 2009 but faced significant opposition.
The Arguments for and Against these Crops:
Supporters of GM crops argue that they have the potential to make crops resistant to pests and diseases, enhance climate resilience, and contribute to sustainable agricultural practices. They believe that India should be open to exploring such innovative technologies to transform its agrarian sector and improve farmers’ livelihoods.
Opponents of GM crops raise concerns about issues such as the development of pest resistance, non-target effects on beneficial insects, and potential impacts on biodiversity. They also question the long-term effects on health and the environment.
The FSII’s Stand and Hope for the Future:
The FSII stands firm in its belief that the regulatory process for scrutinizing GM crops in India is robust and adheres to globally accepted standards. The organization emphasizes the cultural, social, and nutritional importance of crops like mustard in India while urging the recognition of these factors in the discussions on GM crops.
The FSII continues to closely monitor developments related to genetically modified crops and hopes that scientific evidence will prevail. The organization believes that farmers should have access to and benefit from scientific and technological innovations in the future.
Conclusion:
As the Supreme Court begins hearing petitions on genetically modified crops, the FSII remains optimistic about a favorable outcome. The debate surrounding genetically modified crops in India reflects the complexity of balancing the potential benefits of technology with concerns about health, the environment, and traditional farming practices. The court’s decision will have significant implications for India’s agricultural sector and the livelihoods of millions of farmers.
Keywords: Supreme Court, FSII, bio-safety test protocol, genetically modified crops, agriculture, cultivation, technology, regulatory framework, cotton, Bt brinjal, pest resistance, sustainability
Read Why Genetically modified Crops approval has been pending since 2004
